来客网

西方古文物造假不是造假,叫 restorations 你自己当真了

声明:本文转载自 「civic2002博客」, 或因排版与篇幅原因进行过编辑,内容未经本站独立核实,不代表本站立场、观点或建议。 如涉及版权问题,请联系我们,核实后立即删除。 [ 免责声明 ]

波士顿博物馆的颜色鲜艳的木乃伊, 边上就有刚出土时的照片, 惨不忍睹, 不做restorations什么都没有了。

人家敝帚自珍, 做了restorations.

古希腊的雕像, 建筑, 随便google一下, 很多都说清楚了, 不是originals。 是copies.

拿copy来和中国比, 也就没自信的中国老头。 没办法, 老头小时候是真穷。

Are Minoan frescos fake?I assume you’re referring to the frescoes from Knossos “restored” byArthur Evans, the archaeologist who rediscovered the Minoan civilization. Iput the word restored in inverted commas because there has been considerabledebate about whether what he did could be classed as restoration. Hisopponents have claimed that he more-or-less made up his version of thepalace based on the art and architecture of his day. This is an extremeopinion and not one that would be held by most archaeologists today.

So, they are not fake, but nor are they completely accurate to the originals. However, very few restorations or recreations are, simply down to how muchdetail has been lost.

大意: copies不是造假, NOT fake, 但也不是完全准确。在认真考古的基础上认真做了restorations。

评论 (0)