2026年11月12日，新加坡官方就"黄乐（Alice Huang）与 Megaspeed International"一案发布了一份措辞罕见强硬的声明。 这份声明的分量在于： 它并非媒体爆料或匿名消息源，而是新加坡执法体系（警察部队 SPF、关税局、总检察署 AGC）以正式口径，完整交代了一桩牵动中美两国神经的"AI芯片转运疑案"的调查始末。 先交代背景。 在全球AI算力军备竞赛、美国对华先进芯片出口管制层层加码的当下，"新加坡—马来西亚"转运路线一直是外界猜测高端服务器绕道流入第三地的焦点通道。本案主角 Megaspeed 是一家在新加坡注册的服务器采购公司，其CEO黄乐为香港居民；涉及的供应商正是美国服务器巨头超微（Supermicro）。美国工业与安全局（BIS）曾亲自上门做装运后核查——这起案件从第一天起就站在出口管制风暴的正中央。 而这份声明的核心结论，值得逐字细读： 第一，新加坡划清了自己的立场边界。 声明开宗明义：新加坡不执行他国的单边出口管制，但也绝不容忍任何公司借"新加坡"之名，以欺诈手段规避他国管制。一句话，既顶住了美国的长臂管辖压力，又守住了自身"可信赖贸易枢纽"的招牌。 第二，调查结论出人意料。 经过近一年调查，新加坡的结论是：没有充分证据证明黄乐在服务器申报问题上犯罪。 她被处理的原因，是在调查中"提供了明知不准确的信息以淡化自身角色"——处罚仅为严厉警告加禁止入境，护照当日发还，当日离境。 这与外界一度渲染的"芯片走私大案""间谍调查"（声明特意澄清"并未因间谍活动受调查"）相去甚远。 第三，也是最耐人寻味的一点：新加坡公开点名美国不配合。 声明披露，新方自2025年9月起多次向美国司法部（DOJ）和联邦调查局（FBI）请求协助，希望美方促成 Supermicro 配合调查，但"截至今天获得的信息或协助仍然有限"。一国政府以书面声明形式抱怨美方执法合作不力，这在同类案件中极为少见——出口管制的"裁判"，似乎并不愿意交出自己手中的证据。 观点逻辑很清晰： 新加坡在告诉世界 我依法独立办案，证据不足就是证据不足；我需要的证据在美国手里，美国不给；那么结论就不能由华盛顿的叙事来代替。 以为为中英全文 新加坡对黄乐与 Megaspeed International Pte Ltd 的调查 2026年11月12日 1. Singapore takes seriously its reputation as a trusted international trading and business hub. We uphold the rule of law and expect all companies operating in Singapore to conduct their business honestly and in accordance with our laws. While Singapore does not enforce unilateral export controls imposed by other countries, we expect all companies operating here to take into account such regulations, including export controls, in their international business activities. Singapore does not condone companies using their association with Singapore to circumvent or violate other countries’ export controls through fraud or dishonest practices. Where there is evidence of breaches of Singapore law, we take firm action. 1. 新加坡高度重视其作为值得信赖的国际贸易和商业枢纽的声誉。我们坚持法治，并期望所有在新加坡运营的公司诚实经营、遵守我们的法律。虽然新加坡不执行其他国家实施的单边出口管制，但我们期望所有在本地运营的公司在国际商业活动中考虑此类法规，包括出口管制。新加坡绝不姑息公司利用其与新加坡的关联，通过欺诈或不诚实的手段规避或违反其他国家的出口管制。凡有违反新加坡法律的证据，我们必将采取坚决行动。 2. In February 2025, the Singapore Police Force (“SPF”) and Singapore Customs initiated an independent investigation into several companies and their key officers, including Megaspeed International Pte Ltd (“Megaspeed”), a company incorporated in Singapore, and its controllers. The suspected domestic offences pertained to potential false declarations in relation to the purchase of servers and other related offences. As noted by Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs K Shanmugam at a press conference on 3 March 2025, Singapore’s investigations were not based on any request from any country or sovereign entity. 2. 2025年2月，新加坡警察部队（“SPF”）和新加坡关税局对多家公司及其主要人员展开独立调查，其中包括在新加坡注册的公司 Megaspeed International Pte Ltd（“Megaspeed”）及其控制人。涉嫌的本地违法行为涉及与购买服务器相关的潜在虚假申报及其他相关罪行。正如国家安全统筹部长兼内政部长尚穆根（K Shanmugam）在2025年3月3日的记者会上所指出的，新加坡的调查并非基于任何国家或主权实体的请求。 3. Alice Huang (otherwise known as Huang Le), a Hong Kong resident, was investigated for suspected involvement in the possible offences in Singapore, given her position as then-CEO, Chairperson, and one of the key controllers of Megaspeed. Huang was not based in Singapore, and was not investigated for espionage. 3. 黄乐（Alice Huang，又名 Huang Le）是一名香港居民，鉴于其当时担任 Megaspeed 的首席执行官、董事长及主要控制人之一，她因涉嫌参与可能在新加坡发生的违法行为而接受调查。黄乐并不常驻新加坡，且并未因间谍活动而受到调查。 4. On 24 June 2025, the US Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) conducted a voluntary Post-Shipment Verification (“PSV”) check at Megaspeed with Huang present. The PSV check was the first time Singapore came to know about the US’s interest in Megaspeed and Huang. On the same day, SPF also interviewed her as part of its ongoing investigations into Megaspeed. Her passport was impounded under Section 112 of the Criminal Procedure Code 2010 to secure her attendance for purposes of the ongoing investigations, since Huang was not based in Singapore. 4. 2025年6月24日，美国工业与安全局（“BIS”）在黄乐在场的情况下，对 Megaspeed 进行了一次自愿性的装运后核查（“PSV”）。此次 PSV 核查是新加坡首次知晓美方对 Megaspeed 和黄乐的关注。同日，SPF 也对黄乐进行了问话，作为其对 Megaspeed 持续调查的一部分。由于黄乐并非常驻新加坡，其护照依据《2010年刑事诉讼法》第112条被扣押，以确保她在持续调查期间能够配合出席。 5. The physical servers had been purchased by companies (which were under investigation) and exported through Singapore to Malaysia without entering the Singapore market. The SPF was investigating whether the servers had subsequently been routed from Malaysia to another destination, contrary to declarations made in Singapore. To establish the facts, SPF could not rely solely on declarations made by the companies in Singapore. It also needed to verify these against information and records in other jurisdictions, including the jurisdictions from which the servers originated and their eventual destinations. Singapore therefore sought information from the US and other destination jurisdictions, to assist with our independent investigations. 5. 相关实体服务器由多家公司（均为被调查对象）购买，并经由新加坡出口至马来西亚，未进入新加坡市场。SPF 正在调查这些服务器是否随后从马来西亚被转运至另一目的地，从而违反其在新加坡所作的申报。为查明事实，SPF 不能仅依赖这些公司在新加坡所作的申报，还需要与其他司法管辖区的信息和记录进行核实，包括服务器来源地及其最终目的地所在的司法管辖区。因此，新加坡向美国及其他目的地司法管辖区寻求信息，以协助我们的独立调查。 6. In particular, the SPF sought information relating to Supermicro, a US-based supplier of servers, which was relevant to the SPF’s investigations. However, Supermicro provided limited cooperation. At a meeting on 7 July 2025, SPF and the Attorney-General’s Chambers (“AGC”) raised this issue with the US authorities and requested their assistance in securing the company’s cooperation. Since September 2025, SPF has repeated this request on several occasions to the US Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Federal Bureau of Investigations (“FBI”). Despite these repeated requests, Singapore has to date received limited information or assistance in respect of the company. 6. 其中，SPF 寻求与总部位于美国的服务器供应商 Supermicro（超微）相关的信息，这与 SPF 的调查相关。然而，Supermicro 的配合非常有限。在2025年7月7日的一次会议上，SPF 和总检察署（“AGC”）向美方当局提出了这一问题，并请求其协助促成该公司的配合。自2025年9月以来，SPF 已多次向美国司法部（“DOJ”）和联邦调查局（“FBI”）重申这一请求。尽管多次提出请求，但截至今天，新加坡就该公司获得的信息或协助仍然有限。 7. In February 2026, SPF, in consultation with AGC, concluded that there was insufficient evidence to establish that Huang had committed any offences relating to the possible inaccurate declarations for which Megaspeed was being investigated. 7. 2026年2月，SPF 在与总检察署磋商后得出结论：没有充分证据证明黄乐就 Megaspeed 因可能的不实申报而受调查的相关事项犯有任何罪行。 8. However, SPF assessed that Huang had provided information which she knew to be inaccurate to SPF in the course of investigations, to downplay her role in Megaspeed. She was issued a stern warning and barred from re-entering the country. Other cases in the past have been dealt with in a similar way. SPF returned Huang’s passport on 26 February 2026, and she departed Singapore on the same day. 8. 然而，SPF 评估认为，黄乐在调查过程中向 SPF 提供了她明知不准确的信息，以淡化她在 Megaspeed 中的角色。她被发出严厉警告，并被禁止再次入境。过去其他类似案件也曾以类似方式处理。SPF 于2026年2月26日归还了黄乐的护照，她于同日离开新加坡。 9. SPF’s investigations into Megaspeed and six other individuals are ongoing. None of the six persons have been in Singapore since investigations commenced in February 2025. 9. SPF 对 Megaspeed 及另外六名人员的调查仍在进行中。自2025年2月调查开始以来，这六名人员均未曾身在新加坡。对违反新加坡法律的实体采取的坚决行动 Firm Action Taken Against Entities that Violate Singapore’s Laws 10. Singapore is committed to upholding our reputation as a trusted and reliable business hub. We will not allow companies or individuals to misuse Singapore’s business environment to engage in fraud or dishonest practices. Singapore has charged four individuals and four companies in Court between February 2025 and July 2026 for offences – including fraud by false representation in relation to the purchase of servers, with the offences carrying imprisonment terms of up to 20 years each. 10. 新加坡致力于维护我们作为值得信赖和可靠的商业枢纽的声誉。我们绝不允许公司或个人滥用新加坡的商业环境从事欺诈或不诚实的行为。2025年2月至2026年7月期间，新加坡已对四名个人和四家公司在法庭上提起控罪，罪行包括与购买服务器相关的以虚假陈述进行欺诈，各项罪行的最高刑期可达20年监禁。 11. Our approach is clear. Singapore will conduct its own investigations independently, in accordance with our laws and based on the evidence available. We will cooperate with foreign authorities where appropriate, and take firm enforcement action wherever the evidence warrants it. 11. 我们的方式是明确的。新加坡将依照本国法律、根据现有证据独立开展自己的调查。我们将在适当情况下与外国当局合作，并在证据支持之处采取坚决的执法行动。
评论 (0)