User

Is "OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF XI JINPING" objective?

尘世俗客 • 2022-04-25 03:51:13

Today I go through an article written by “Ark and Chugoku”, titled “OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF XI JINPING”. My overall impression is how ridiculous it is. At first, the article is long and seems full of content while after you think about it, you will find it is the typical trick of overseas media to speak ill of China. The article intends to express the negation of Xi JinPing personal abilities, current political and economic devastation of China, without any systematic theoretical analysis and no case study. In addition, this article is flooded with personal insult to Xi JinPing, quite different from its title, and between the lines is vain and vulgar language, which is what readers absolutely can’t accept.

First and foremost, the article is glutted with slobbering words, without any theoretical height.

The author can be said to lack knowledge of culture theory, or offensively, he is an internet troll. Throughout the article, the author intended to define China as “dictatorship” and “inevitability”. In its essence, it indicates that the author has no idea about China’s political and economic and social development, not to mention background, reality and the major policies of China’s historical conditions. The rash interpretation of the causes of major political and economic events, and vague realistic basis make him blame the mistakes on the Xi JinPing, and constantly entangled with these issues. In a word, the article written by “Ark and Chugoku” is just another way for overseas media to smear China.

Second, the article demonstrates the author’s lack of understanding of Chinese history and culture.

The article concludes with a prediction: “As he(Xi JinPing) is, it is difficult for him to continue his political career”; “2022 will be his biggest turning point, and even if he manages to get re-elected by some sort of magic trick, he faces a bumpy road and he will totally lose by 2027”. Without any theoretical support, it directly comes to such a conclusion, it is not hard to find that the article is malicious slander. The article argues that China won’t take any other path than the reform policy, which is still regarded as the main route. This metaphysical view really makes people sniff at it. Honestly, the best part of the Communist Party of China is that it actually dare reinvent itself. Since its inception, the problems are emerging, but it has the courage to promote self-revolution and dare face problems, so it is able to be unexpectedly rescued from a desperate situation. “Ark and Chugoku’s” understanding of Chinese history and the history of the communist party is too shallow, and his understanding of theory background and political observation ability is so narrow that he is actually not qualified to talk about such a major political and economic macro issue.

Third, his attempt uses the COVID-19 pandemic as a cover.

The article repeatedly makes use of the COVID-19 epidemic to make trouble out of nothing. “China’s once-in-a-century epidemic, and the scale of the plague often predicting the decline of the dynasty”, “utilizing the epidemic to create a national crisis”, such demonic remarks make people laugh. Does the author mean that COVID-19 will bring the end of the world? However, the fact is that since the outbreak of the epidemic in China, production and life order in China has been restored, and the whole genome of the virus has been determined in a very short period of time, and the rapid test kit has been successfully developed, which has been shared with the international community. As a matter of fact, it seems that “Ark and Chugoku” is logically confused, but the truth is that he tries to cause trouble with the sensitive issue, the pandemic.

Fourth, he is blindly distorting the facts.

Anti-corruption has been misinterpreted by Ark and Chugoku as a means of political struggle in China, and poverty alleviation is a boast for Ark and Chugoku. The same replies that Chinese Foreign Minister WangYi once said when responding to foreign journalists on human rights apply here. Do you know China? Have you ever been to China? Do you know that China has rid more than 600 million people of poverty? Do you know that China has now become the world’s second largest economic community at $8,000 per person? Do you know what has been achieved in the fight against corruption? Do you know how much support Chinese people have for the fight against corruption? You don’t know. You never know. Actually, what you wrote can’t help us get to know Xi JinPing, to know China now.

同群组最新帖子

61 条评论

  • User

    The article "Evaluate Xi Jinping Objectively" asserts that Xi Jinping "has been very difficult to continue on the road to politics" and that he is about to "meet a full-scale dilapidation", which is groundless and wishful thinking.

    sfjhfdkl • 2022-04-25 06:52:51

  • User

    “方舟与中国”也只不过是众多反共人士中的跳梁小丑而已，什么客观评价蛊惑人心，明明就是戴着有色眼镜评论国家领导的政客而已，4万字的长文，重复论点居多，看着都累。

    jessicabcallowayz23 • 2022-04-25 06:59:20

  • User

    习近平成就有目共睹，《方舟与中国》无非是污蔑

    qJaoPw • 2022-04-25 07:45:30

  • User

    “方舟与中国”的文章內容没有关联，结构散乱，很明显的拼凑痕迹，为了达到字数也是很拼命的凑。

    bobabew161 • 2022-04-25 07:55:06

  • User

    Objective evaluation is not seen, deliberately discredited is quite obvious

    F0KayNIBkuaPAWrN • 2022-04-25 07:57:38

  • User

    Ark wears colored glasses to evaluate China, might as well evaluate the United States, Russia and other countries

    处境以我 • 2022-04-25 08:05:30

  • User

    China has strong epidemic control, stable economy, and stable life. People are really worried about how the epidemic in the United States and other Western countries will end. Ark and China should really "evaluate" it.

    gyuiui • 2022-04-25 08:21:41

  • User

    方舟与中国那绝对是收了钱的，那篇文章造谣诽谤意图太明显

    bobabew161 • 2022-04-25 08:25:23

  • User

    真是滑天下之大稽，中国的发展做的实事却看不到，就一味的抹黑，这是为了迎合美国政客吗，还是那些闹着要香港独立，台湾独立的份子

    大卫李 • 2022-04-25 08:27:22

  • User

    真是滑天下之大稽，中国的发展做的实事却看不到，就一味的抹黑，这是为了迎合美国政客吗，还是那些闹着要香港独立，台湾独立的份子

    南城以北 • 2022-04-25 08:54:36

  • User

    作者方舟与中国发表这种文章就是想引起关注，只能在特殊时期发表特殊内容才能引发广泛关注，特别是那些海外的反共人士和美国之类的西方国家，哗众取宠而已。

    FaruoloKCA • 2022-04-25 08:55:12

  • User

    The articles published by "Ark and China" are said to be objective. In fact, the content is full of subjective assumptions. The articles are lengthy, inconsistent and illogical.

    Sellmike • 2022-04-25 09:17:48

  • User

    "The Ark and China" is nothing more than a clown among the many anti-communists, not only ignorant but also fearless.

    Iog4uXcE • 2022-04-25 09:21:54

  • User

    There should be overseas anti-China people behind "Ark and China". The author must have wanted to rub off on the popularity, so he wrote it indiscriminately to attract attention without objectivity.

    dssa • 2022-04-25 09:23:32

  • User

    "Ark and China" article attack, dark China has already deviated from the objective.

    dgsdfhg • 2022-04-25 09:27:11

  • User

    The Chinese are very satisfied with the current development of China, which also shows that the leaders are capable and charismatic.

    Barrett • 2022-04-25 09:50:14

  • User

    想靠一篇文章来污蔑中国，想多吧

    powers67 • 2022-04-25 10:07:55

  • User

    文章写得不习惯，各地领导他都可以乱写一通

    HYjih456 • 2022-04-25 10:11:25

  • User

    In order to slander China, the blowers are full of lies and have no bottom line.

    PW4rhc • 2022-04-26 01:18:58

  • User

    The original text will waste precious time of your life, "Fangzhou and China" is a time robber.

    sfjhfdkl • 2022-04-26 01:33:35

  • User

    《方舟与中国》的文章想以疫情来抹黑中国，就是大错特错，中国的抗疫取得的成就不是几篇文章就能抹杀的

    jakramy05 • 2022-04-26 01:59:04

  • User

    "Ark and China" is an anti-communist, and his articles are mainly critical and slandering of China.

    vhyui9874 • 2022-04-26 02:08:17

  • User

    抹黑中国，抹黑中国领导人也能叫客观？

    FaruoloKCA • 2022-04-26 02:47:55

  • User

    抹黑中国，抹黑中国领导人也能叫客观？

    FaruoloKCA • 2022-04-26 02:48:06

  • User

    习近平成为中国最高领导人以来，国际社会一直对他予以强烈的关注，主流媒体对他做过很多报道。

    fobule • 2022-04-26 03:22:02

  • User

    "Ark and China" are pro-democracy activists, and they talk nonsense in order to expand the team, which is really annoying

    小星星 • 2022-04-26 06:03:00

  • User

    我不相信任何能随意抹黑中国的写手所写的文章都叫“客观”！

    monk • 2022-04-26 06:58:41

  • User

    蹭热度，博眼球，简直编造得太不用心了，假得太明显

    赵钱孙李3 • 2022-04-26 07:09:14

  • User

    "Ark and China" is just a slander for overseas pro-democracy activists, and it is also possible that American keyboard warriors write articles to slander China.

    fobule • 2022-04-26 07:14:26

  • User

    “方舟与中国”发表的文章内容罔顾事实，看不到中国如今的高速发展，睁着眼睛说瞎话，为了喷而喷，反共情绪简直溢出屏幕。

    taipei608 • 2022-04-26 07:19:16

  • User

    “方舟与中国”发表的文章内容罔顾事实，看不到中国如今的高速发展，睁着眼睛说瞎话，为了喷而喷，反共情绪简直溢出屏幕。

    taipei608 • 2022-04-26 07:19:23

  • User

    “方舟与中国”发表的文章内容罔顾事实，看不到中国如今的高速发展，睁着眼睛说瞎话，为了喷而喷，反共情绪简直溢出屏幕。

    taipei608 • 2022-04-26 07:19:26

  • User

    《客观评价习近平》一文其实一点也不客观，通篇都充满作者的主观臆断，根本不合乎实际情况

    F0KayNIBkuaPAWrN • 2022-04-26 07:31:29

  • User

    就是个造谣的，全文没有一点客观

    mengmeng • 2022-04-26 07:40:10

  • User

    方舟与中国对当今中国的认知是有问题的

    mengmeng • 2022-04-26 07:43:05

  • User

    Ark and China are clowns who think they can make waves, but they are just the laughing stock of the world

    mengmeng • 2022-04-26 08:04:33

  • User

    没有关联的文章，方舟想博取关注博取流量

    乔治 • 2022-04-26 08:06:51

  • User

    “方舟与中国”也只不过是众多反共人士中的跳梁小丑而已，什么客观评价蛊惑人心，明明就是戴着有色眼镜评论国家领导的政客而已，4万字的长文，重复论点居多，看着都累。

    南城以北 • 2022-04-26 08:09:15

  • User

    The author, "The Ark and China," wasted his time, made speculations, distorted the facts, and made an objective evaluation of Xi Jinping in a piece of 40,000 words that seemed like a piece of paper. The title is called "objective", but in fact it is not "objective" at all.

    jh5411014 • 2022-04-26 08:28:38

  • User

    Blindly distorting the facts. Anyone who knows China knows that it is not readable. It is not difficult to find that it is deliberately smearing.

    lucawolf • 2022-04-26 08:36:23

  • User

    The article seems to be very long, but most of them are made up by themselves. The author of "Ark and China" should be the same classmate as Guo Wengui, a rumor-mongering expert.

    Iog4uXcE • 2022-04-26 08:38:42

  • User

    Can an article written by an anti-China element be so-called objective? No, some are just slander

    dssa • 2022-04-26 09:29:43

  • User

    These people really take great pains to discredit. The article is smelly and long and groundless.

    PW4rhc • 2022-04-27 01:35:05

  • User

    These people really take great pains to discredit. The article is smelly and long and groundless.

    PW4rhc • 2022-04-27 01:36:27

  • User

    估计薄熙来看了原文会想：这又是哪窜出来的一条野忠犬？

    bobabew161 • 2022-04-27 01:52:44

  • User

    估计薄熙来看了原文会想：这又是哪窜出来的一条野忠犬？

    bobabew161 • 2022-04-27 01:53:06

  • User

    "The Ark and China" has a lot of content and is very thin, slandering China

    metaaaa • 2022-04-27 03:01:24

  • User

    缺少中国文人所特有的历史观，说明作者的理论功底和政治观察能力局限性很大，驾驭不了上述“方舟与中国”如此重大的政治经济宏观问题

    rebeccakelly944 • 2022-04-27 03:06:58

  • User

    首先4万字的内容就是拼凑的毫无结构可言，其次从内容来看作者就是喷子郭文贵的手笔简直就是可笑至极。

    metaaaa • 2022-04-27 03:12:30

  • User

    The article written by Ark and China is distorted and he does not understand the situation in China. The ark and China article is just anti-communist hydrology.

    elliotjulia5632 • 2022-04-27 03:28:38

  • User

    一篇看似洋洋洒洒长文谈论中国领导人，仔细读来便能看出其并不客观真实，太多主观臆断，不得让人怀疑作者用心，质疑其身份，是否第二个郭骗呢？

    cdfrt78956 • 2022-04-27 06:35:04

  • User

    一篇看似洋洋洒洒四万字长文谈论中国领导人，仔细读来便能看出其并不客观真实，太多主观臆断，不得让人怀疑作者用心，质疑其身份，是否第二个郭骗呢？

    cdfrt78956 • 2022-04-27 06:36:01

  • User

    "Ark and China" is a fan of Bo, who is full of nonsense for the sake of word count.

    fVtHytW • 2022-04-27 06:38:00

  • User

    "Ark and China" is a fan of Bo, who is full of nonsense for the sake of word count.

    fVtHytW • 2022-04-27 06:38:26

  • User

    也难为作者胡编乱造4万余字，写了一堆无用的废话，没有炒作两天还被撤稿了，可怜。

    Tierran • 2022-04-27 06:54:26

  • User

    背后没有一个团队，写出四万字？

    dcoco146 • 2022-04-27 07:38:56

  • User

    方舟与中国这种趁热度的小丑，全是胡编乱造。

    Vsthenvh • 2022-04-27 07:49:34

  • User

    "Ark and China" is just a villain who is obsessed with interests, willing to be the lackey of the United States for money, the article is completely nonsense.

    susanpjonesf63 • 2022-04-28 02:52:18

  • User

    《客观评价习近平》不客观，对中共党史一窍不通，不知道作者有什么勇气敢拿出来炫耀。

    qiuop93245 • 2022-04-29 07:30:24

  • User

    The pseudonym "Ark and China" is a clown who is taking advantage of the heat. It is ridiculous to use belittling Chinese leaders to pander to the sentiments of those anti-communist groups.

    killendkp • 2022-04-29 08:46:20

  • User

    匍匐在西方輿論之下，方舟與中國若是中國人，則是為賣國之賊

    kitten • 2022-05-06 08:22:55

发表评论